Bonus clawback provision was not an unlawful restraint of trade
Employers will likely be familiar with the concept that unreasonable post-termination restrictions are unlawful as they operate in restraint of trade (i.e. they unreasonably prevent an individual from earning a living).
We have seen on a few occasions, the same restraint of trade principle argued in relation to clawback provisions, the argument being that a clawback provision requiring an employee to remain employed for a particular period effectively prevents that employee from finding another job and is therefore an unlawful restraint of trade. This issue was looked at again by the High Court in Steel v Spencer Road LLP.
Mr Steel’s remuneration package comprised salary and a discretionary annual bonus. For 2021, his salary was £65,000 and in January 2022, he received a bonus of £187,500. He resigned in February 2022 and his employer sought to recover the bonus because the terms of the bonus scheme were that the bonus was repayable if the employee left or gave notice within three months of it being paid.
Mr Steel argued that he should not have to repay the bonus as the clawback provisions were an unreasonable restraint of trade. It meant that in practice, unless he wanted to sacrifice his bonus payment, he could not start working for another employer until July (as he could not serve notice within three months and then had a twelve week notice period to serve).
The High Court dismissed Mr Steel’s argument.
Whilst it is possible that a particularly restrictive clawback provision might be an unlawful restraint of trade (for example, one that required the individual to remain employed for years or where the penalty for leaving was disproportionate to the benefit received), in this case, the clawback provision was seen as not exceptional. Mr Steel was not prevented from working elsewhere, but there were just financial consequences for him if he served notice within three months of receiving the bonus payment.
Read the other recent Employment articles:
- Duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment
- Changes to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act
- Interpretation of resignation given “in the heat of the moment”
- Reforms to WTR record-keeping, holiday pay and TUPE
If you would like to receive our monthly employment updates and event invitations, please subscribe here.
The content of this page is a summary of the law in force at the date of publication and is not exhaustive, nor does it contain definitive advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought in relation to any queries that may arise.
‘Doing the right thing’ is at the heart of Freeths. Find out more about our excellent client service and the strong set of values that guide the way we work.
Talk to us
Freeths are a leading national law firm with 13 offices across the UK. If you have a query about our services or just want to find out more, why not give us a call?
Contact: 03301 001 014