Commercial Agents Regulations 1993: What still matters and how to manage the risks
Despite being on the statute book for more than 30 years, the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 (“CARs”) continue to shape UK business relationships between principals and self employed sales intermediaries, and, after a government review, they remain in force without amendment.
Who is a “commercial agent” and what is in scope?
In accordance with the CARs, a commercial agent is a self employed intermediary with continuing authority to negotiate the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of a principal (and, in some cases, to conclude contracts in the principal’s name). Services are outside the CARs’ scope.
Goods vs services (digital products)
In Kompaktwerk GmbH v LivePerson Netherlands B.V. [2024] EWHC 2278 (Comm), the High Court held that a time limited software as a service (SaaS) subscription was not a good. Instead, the Court determined that SaaS was a service, so the CARs did not apply. The Court emphasised there is no permanent divestment of ownership and the “heart of the product” is hosted access, not goods transferred to a customer.
Do you need a written agency contract?
The CARs apply even without a written agreement; however, either party can request a signed written statement of the agency terms, and any waiver of that right is void. In practice, written terms reduce scope for dispute.
Core protections for agents
- Fair remuneration and commission: where the contract is silent, CARs imply default rules for remuneration and commission, including circumstances in which commission is due on transactions concluded after termination
- Minimum notice for termination: for open ended agreements, the minimum notice is one month in year one, two months in year two, and three months from year three onwards. Longer periods may be agreed, but the principal’s notice cannot be shorter than the agent’s
- Termination payments – indemnity or compensation: on termination, an agent is ordinarily entitled to compensation (the default) or, if expressly agreed, an indemnity. Compensation reflects the value of the agency lost to a hypothetical purchaser at termination. Indemnity reflects the ongoing benefit the principal enjoys from customers the agent introduced or developed and is typically capped at around one year’s average commission. Agents must notify their intention to claim within one year of termination
Duties – it’s not one sided
The CARs imply good faith and information sharing duties on both sides. Agents must protect their principal’s interests, make proper efforts to negotiate or conclude instructed transactions, and follow reasonable instructions. Principals must provide necessary documentation about the goods, supply information the agent needs to perform their duties, and inform the agent promptly about acceptance, refusal or non execution of transactions.
Richard Coates
Partner & National Head of Automotive
Get in touch
Get in touch with Richard and Oli to see how they can support you
Recent developments you should know
The 2024–2025 government consultation
The Department for Business & Trade consulted on whether to deregulate CARs for new agency arrangements. On 13 February 2025, the government confirmed the regulations would remain in force without amendment in Great Britain. While the feedback was polarised, with agents generally favouring retention and many principals preferring deregulation, the outcome provides legal continuity.
Digital sector clarity
Following Kompaktwerk v LivePerson, intermediaries operating in SaaS or hosted digital models should not expect CARs protection. Robust contractual safeguards are therefore essential in these sectors.
Practical steps to manage risk
- Confirm scope: ensure the relationship relates to goods, not services. Those in digital or SaaS sectors should assume the CARs will not apply and negotiate bespoke protections
- Insist on written terms: use the statutory right to request a signed written statement of terms
- Act promptly: on termination, notify any intention to claim compensation or indemnity within one year, or the right is lost
- Handle termination carefully: failure to comply with statutory notice periods is a common source of disputes. Legal advice before terminating, particularly for alleged poor performance, can be cost effective
- Consider indemnity provisions: where appropriate, expressly agreeing an indemnity (rather than default compensation) may limit financial exposure
- Maintain good faith compliance: keep documentation up to date, communicate decisions on transactions promptly, and flag anticipated sales reductions where required
Key takeaways
- The CARs remain fully in force in Great Britain
- The regulations apply only to goods, not services, including most SaaS models
- Statutory rights around notice, termination payments and good faith cannot be contracted out of
- Agents must act quickly if asserting termination related claims
- Written agreements remain best practice for both sides
For further information on this topic please get in touch with the authors Richard Coates and Oli Jackson.
CARs legal article series
Please check out the other articles which part of this CARs legal article series:
The content of this page is a summary of the law in force at the date of publication and is not exhaustive, nor does it contain definitive advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought in relation to any queries that may arise.
Related expertise
Contact us today
Whatever your legal needs, our wide ranging expertise is here to support you and your business, so let’s start your legal journey today and get you in touch with the right lawyer to get you started.
Get in touch
For general enquiries, please complete this form and we will direct your message to the most appropriate person.