Management buy-out vs employee ownership trust: Which route is right for you?
Following Rachel Reeves' Autumn Budget in October 2025 (Autumn Budget), management buy-outs (MBOs) have returned firmly to the centre of exit planning conversations for many business owners, particularly as a result of the changes to the tax treatment applicable on a sale to an employee ownership trust (EOT). Whilst a sale to an EOT remains an attractive option for the right businesses and business owners, the increased conditions and complexity introduced by the latest Autumn Budget led many owners and their advisers to look again at an MBO as a compelling and commercially straightforward route to exit.
What is a management buy-out?
A management buy-out occurs where the existing management team of a business acquires full or part ownership of that business from its current shareholders. It is a well-established exit route that allows business owners to realise value whilst passing control to a team that already knows the business intimately, and who may well have helped the owners to build that value. The management team will typically fund the acquisition through a combination of the company's existing cash reserves, external debt finance (such as bank lending) and in some cases their own resources.
What is an employee ownership trust?
An EOT is a special purpose trust that acquires a controlling interest in a company for the benefit of that company’s employees.
The headline tax benefit for selling shareholders is significant: where the conditions are met, the disposal of shares to an EOT attracts a 50% rate of CGT (an effective rate of 12% for higher-rate tax payers). In addition, eligible employees can benefit from tax-free bonuses of up to £3,600 per year under the current rules.
However, the price paid for advantageous tax treatment is that, inevitably, there are strings attached and stringent requirements that must be met by business owners who pursue this option. There is also a risk that specific future events may lead to a ‘clawback’ of the tax saved, meaning selling shareholders may face a future tax bill due to matters outside of their control (such as the company ceasing to trade).
Why the shift in popularity towards management buy-outs?
Prior to the Autumn Budget, the EOT option had established itself as one of the most tax-efficient exit routes available to business owners. The combination of CGT exemption on the sale proceeds and the ability to preserve the culture and ethos of the business for the benefit of the employees made it an increasingly popular choice.
The Autumn Budget, however, reduced the CGT exemption from 100% to 50% as well as increasing the “seller clawback period” (being the period following the sale whereby the relevant EOT conditions must continue to be complied with) to 4 full tax years following the tax year in which the sale took place (when it was previously only 1 full tax year).
There are also strict restrictions preventing the selling shareholders retaining overall control of the business going forward. This can be a crucial concern for sellers, as often a large portion of the value is left outstanding as ‘deferred’ consideration which is paid over several years (often funded by business profits).
In future budgets the seller clawback period could be further extended, or additional restrictions and controls added.
The combination of these commercial restrictions, and the reduced tax advantages, have encouraged more conversations about which route best suits the individual circumstances of the business and its owners.
Get in touch
The key features of each route
The management team acquires the shares from the selling shareholders, typically via a newly incorporated private limited company, often with the support of external finance
The selling shareholders receive cash consideration (either in full at completion or often partly deferred), usually subject to CGT at the applicable rate
The management team takes control and ownership of the business – subject to any protections / veto rights which are commercially agreed to protect the deferred consideration while it remains outstanding and due to the selling shareholders
The deferred consideration can be secured (for example by way of a debenture over the assets of the business)
The selling shareholders can remain involved in the business in a variety of capacities, if they so wish
The transaction can be structured and completed more quickly than a normal ‘arms- length’ sale to a third party. The management team has intimate knowledge of the business and its operations, meaning only limited due diligence is required
Looking to the future, the management team have the opportunity to continue building value the business and then sell to another buyer
The EOT must acquire — and there is ongoing obligation to retain — a "controlling interest" in the company, meaning the selling shareholders can no longer be in control of the business, even if they choose to remain involved in its management
The sale of shares to the EOT, where the conditions are met, receives a 50% exemption from CGT for the selling shareholders
The EOT must continue to meet the necessary conditions for a period of four full tax years after the tax year in which the sale takes place – failure to meet the conditions during this period can result in the tax relief being withdrawn
Usually, there is an upfront payment financed by the company's current cash reserves and/or external funding, and a deferred element. The deferred balance is then payable over a suitable period of time from either future profits generated in the business or via third-party lending. There are restrictions on the selling shareholders securing the deferred consideration, but certain limited protections may be permitted while the deferred amount is outstanding
All-employee benefit principle – EOTs must be established on terms to benefit all eligible employees on the same terms (although benefits can be differentiated by reference to: (i) remuneration; (ii) length of service; and (iii) hours worked, only)
Eligible employees can benefit from tax-free bonuses of up to £3,600 per year under the current rules
There are additional considerations (and costs) required when selling to an EOT, including obtaining an appropriate, independent valuation of the business.
There are also ongoing costs and administration involved in setting up and operating the EOT. While it is possible for an EOT to sell the business in the future, the main intention for EOT’s is that they continue owning the business so it is operated for the benefit of the employees
Key differences at a glance
MBO | EOT | |
Why buys the business? | The management team | A trust, for the benefit of all eligible employees |
CGT on the sale? | Yes - at the full applicable rate (currently 14% (with BADR) or 24%*) | Yes - but a 50% relief applies to the applicable rate (currently an effective rate of 9% (with BADR) or 12% (where conditions met)*) |
Control after sale? | Management team and selling shareholders can agree any required controls between them (no legal restrictions) | EOT holds a controlling interest; sellers cannot remain in control (legal restrictions on control) |
Funding | Often finance raised by the management team (e.g. debt, equity) | Generally using company's cash reserves, bank funding and future profits |
Who benefits? | The management team (and sellers on exit) | All eligible employees, including potential for tax-free bonuses |
Ongoing conditions? | None (other than those commercially agreed) | Yes - qualifying conditions must be maintained for the four tax years following the tax year of completion |
Complexity post-Autumn Budget | Straightforward and well-understood | Increased - additional conditions have been introduced and changed over the previous two budgets |
Speed and structure | Can be completed relatively quickly | Typically a more complicated process which involves setting up a trust and corporate trustee which is compliant with the legislation |
Future sale | Management team can grow the business and sell on, realising the value they have created | Generally an EOT would retain ownership for the benefit of the employees A sale is possible, but would be a complex transaction |
*subject to a formal tax analysis | ||
Which option is right for you?
The right exit route will depend on a number of factors specific to each business and its owners. As a general guide:
An MBO may be the more appropriate option where:
the management team is ready, willing and able to take on full ownership and control of the business;
finance is available, whether through existing cash in the business, vendor loan notes, external borrowing or private equity support
the selling shareholders may wish to receive their consideration in full or substantially in full at completion, or require security over any deferred consideration
speed and commercial simplicity are priorities for the sellers
the sellers do not wish to be constrained by the ongoing conditions that apply to EOTs; and
the management team are looking to build the business either for the benefit of their own families in the long term, or to realise increased value on a sale in the medium term
An EOT may be the more appropriate option where:
there is a desire to preserve the culture of the business with the least disruption
the selling shareholders are motivated by legacy and wish to reward their employee base for its contribution to the business
the sellers are comfortable receiving their consideration over a period of time from the company's future profits
the business has a strong and well-established employee base that would genuinely benefit from the EOT model and there is a strong management team who are capable and sufficiently motivated to run the company successfully moving forward; and
the tax saving from the partial CGT exemption is sufficiently significant to justify the additional structural complexity, but the sellers are comfortable that the exemption could potentially be withdrawn
Get in touch
The latest Autumn Budget has undoubtedly shifted the landscape for business owners considering their exit options. The removal of the complete CGT exemption, combined with increasing complexity and restrictions, has brought the management buy-out firmly back into focus as a commercially attractive route to exit. That said, a sale to an EOT remains a compelling option for the right businesses. Whether an MBO or an EOT is the more appropriate route will ultimately depend on the individual circumstances, priorities and motivations of each business owner.
How can we help?
We have extensive experience advising on EOT transactions and MBO transactions, acting for the management team or the selling shareholders, and is able to provide commercial advice to clients to facilitate the deal in a timely manner. As a full service law firm, we can provide not only the legal advice and documentation for the transaction but also the tax and structuring advice to ensure you achieve the best possible outcome - whichever route is right for you.
If you would like to discuss your exit options with us, please contact Lisa Wallis, Andy Francey or your usual Freeths contact.
The content of this page is a summary of the law in force at the date of publication and is not exhaustive, nor does it contain definitive advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought in relation to any queries that may arise.
Contact us today
Whatever your legal needs, our wide ranging expertise is here to support you and your business, so let’s start your legal journey today and get you in touch with the right lawyer to get you started.
Get in touch
For general enquiries, please complete this form and we will direct your message to the most appropriate person.