Implementing the socially necessary local services list - why local transport authorities need to act now
What is changing?
Local transport authorities operating Enhanced Partnerships must prepare and publish through amended Enhanced Partnership documents a list of local bus services considered socially necessary by 31 March 2027. Although the deadline may appear some way off, the evidence gathering, engagement, consultation, governance and legal drafting required mean Authorities should be engaging in a carefully managed process now.
Under the Bus Services Act 2025, every Authority with an Enhanced Partnership Plan in place on 31 March 2027 must have completed a Socially Necessary Local Services (SNLS) list and incorporated it into the Enhanced Partnership Plan (EPP). The list must be evidence-based. The Enhanced Partnership Scheme (EP Scheme) will also require attention as it must be varied to include a procedure requiring operators to give the Authority earlier warning when a listed service is at risk of permanent cancellation or may become subject to a material reduction in operating hours or in places served.
Why action is needed now
The principal risk is leaving a multi-stage programme too late. Authorities will need to coordinate transport, legal, procurement, equality, governance and communications input, while obtaining information from operators and managing public and political interest in services that are, or are not, included.
The final list and the decisions behind it must be transparent, objective and supported by an auditable evidence base
Routes not selected may attract challenge from communities, making consultation, equality assessment and clear decision records particularly important
Both the EP Plan and EP Scheme must be reopened, with the required operator and CMA consultation built into the timetable
Meeting the deadline is not simply a matter of publishing a list. Authorities will need to establish a defensible methodology, gather and assess evidence, engage operators and communities, complete equality and cross-boundary engagement, vary the statutory documents and be ready to operate the new process from day one.
As both the EP Plan and any EP Scheme(s) require reopening the Authority will need to plan on the basis that the procedure in section 138K of the Transport Act 2000 governs the variation procedure.
Five actions to take now
Confirm the senior sponsor, project lead, internal approvals and any budget required for transport consultancy, legal support or analytical software
Work backwards from 31 March 2027, allowing for statutory periods, internal governance and contingency
Allow sufficient time for evidence gathering, methodology consultation, draft variations, equality assessment, cross-boundary engagement, operator and CMA consultation, formal approvals, publication and implementation
Use the Board to inform development, maintenance and review while preserving the Authority's decision-making responsibility. Operators outside the Board must also be involved
Design the notification, assessment, escalation and record-keeping process that will be needed once the regime goes live making sure a monitoring process is also established
Build a defensible SNLS list
The list must reflect local need and be supported by a transparent, objective process. The Authority should:
Identify access to employment, essential education, primary and secondary healthcare, essential retail, culture, sport and leisure, together with any additional locally significant destinations. If opting to bring all local services into the list take particular care over operator consultations and consider potential impact on other authorities where services are cross boundary. Criteria may need to distinguish rural and urban conditions. Also, at this point, define how the Authority will determine whether service alterations should be considered material requiring the review process to be invoked
Request operator information on demand, patronage, concessionary and child travel, viability and known pressures. Add data on deprivation, car ownership, social inclusion, strategic interchange and relevant consultation responses
Put a non-disclosure arrangement and controlled data-handling protocol in place with each operator before requesting early disclosure of operator information. The DfT Enhanced Partnership Manual provides a basic form of confidentiality agreement. Within Freeths we have identified further detail that the agreement is likely to require to fully recognise operator legitimate interests in the scope of confidentiality so be prepared to accept amendments requested by operators
Use a documented workbook or scorecard showing the evidence, weighting, reasoning and treatment of each candidate service. Record departures from the methodology. This is essential given likely public scrutiny and the risk of judicial review which could delay implementation beyond the statutory deadline
Keep the assessment live while the list is being developed; new commercially introduced and authority-contracted services may both require consideration
Consult early and properly
Engage operators on the proposed methodology, information requirements and practical operation of the regime
The Authority should consult representative groups and affected communities. The process should be accessible and should test whether the proposed criteria overlook particular needs. There is likely to be strong public interest in proposals and expect a degree of controversy over routes not selected where communities may question or even challenge decisions taken
Do this alongside—not after—the list. Feed identified impacts back into scoring and decisions
Where a potentially listed service crosses an administrative boundary, consult the other LTA. Record the outcome while recognising that one authority’s decision does not bind the other
Submit the proposed variations to the Competition and Markets Authority and build sufficient contingency into the timetable for comments and response
Expect to encounter challenges
In practice, the most demanding issues are likely to be agreeing a methodology that works across rural and urban contexts, obtaining commercially sensitive operator data, managing cross-boundary services, responding to stakeholder expectations and translating policy decisions into workable statutory documentation. These workstreams should be managed together rather than sequentially, so that evidence and consultation findings can inform the final drafting.
Vary the Enhanced Partnership documents
The legal documentation must translate policy into an operable regime. The Authority should prepare a notice and draft variations which:
insert the final SNLS list into the EPP
identify development, monitoring and maintenance of the list as an Authority measure in the EP Scheme
place clear operator requirements in the form of Service Standards in the EP Scheme, including requirements to provide early notice of service amendments and cancellations in relation to SNLS listed services
prepare the processes that the Authority will put in place covering operator’s notifications, evidence gathering, engagement, mitigation and importantly decision and record-keeping at the conclusion of a mitigation-based review
provide a workable process for regular review and amendment of the list
As both the EP Plan and EP Scheme require reopening, the Authority will need to follow the procedure in section 138K of the Transport Act 2000. Obtain the necessary internal authority before commencing the formal process. Complete operator consultation, allowing for the statutory period. Note that the operator consultation phase may conclude early if every affected operator confirms that it does not object. Consider CMA advice, document the Authority’s response, secure final approval and publish the varied EPP and EP Scheme before the deadline.
Be ready to operate the regime on day one
Implementation is not achieved merely by publishing documents. The Authority needs an internal response protocol. On notice of cancellation of a listed service, this must trigger the statutory process. On notice of a variation, there needs to be “consideration of materiality”, a test that involves consideration of the impact the change is likely to have on access affected communities will have to essential retail centres, opportunities or activities. Where the threshold is met, the Authority must consider alternative arrangements capable of mitigating the effect, apply proportionate consideration and evidence its best endeavours.
It will be possible and helpful to the strong management of situations that arise to have a toolkit to support the approach to be taken when an operator believes a service is under threat. This could include a standard operator notice, assessment template, options appraisal process and if this should prove necessary a decision maker escalation route and decision record.
Mitigation may involve possible approaches to supporting the service, coordination with other operators (care being taken to navigate through the confidentiality arrangements that will be in place) alternative transport solutions, contractual arrangements or time-limited grant support. The regime does not require the Authority to fund an otherwise unfunded service, but it does require a genuine, timely and documented search for alternatives. Any agreed mitigation should be made binding where appropriate or recorded in a clear public statement of commitments endorsed by the affected operator and other operators who may be involved in the solution that has been found.
How Freeths can help
This is a specialist, deadline-driven programme at a time when local authority transport teams face significant competing pressures. Transport consultants can support the evidence and analytical work, while experienced legal advisers can help authorities design the statutory process, manage consultation and governance risk, support drafting the EPP and EP Scheme variations, and prepare the operational toolkit. Freeths supported seven local transport authorities with their initial Enhanced Partnership arrangements and can apply that experience to this next phase of work. Early engagement can also create efficiencies by identifying the common elements of the process while adapting the drafting to each Authority's existing documents.
The 31 March 2027 deadline is fixed, but the amount of evidence, consultation and governance work required will vary by Authority. Starting now will give authorities more scope to resolve data gaps, engage operators and communities properly, and complete the statutory variation process without compressing the final stages.
The content of this page is a summary of the law in force at the date of publication and is not exhaustive, nor does it contain definitive advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought in relation to any queries that may arise.
Related expertise
Contact us today
Whatever your legal needs, our wide ranging expertise is here to support you and your business, so let’s start your legal journey today and get you in touch with the right lawyer to get you started.
Get in touch
For general enquiries, please complete this form and we will direct your message to the most appropriate person.