Policy choice, not perfection.

That is the clear message for local authorities from the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s recent judgment on the Cardiff Airport subsidy. In Bristol Airport v Welsh Ministers (7 April 2026), the Tribunal reaffirmed an important principle for public bodies: subsidy control is not about achieving the “right” answer, but about reaching a rational, well reasoned decision.

The Tribunal was clear that public authorities enjoy a real margin of discretion when applying the Subsidy Control Act 2022. Its role is not to re run economic assessments or revisit policy judgments, but to ask whether the authority’s reasoning was irrational in public law terms. Where a council or government body has identified a legitimate policy objective, considered relevant evidence and explained why it reached its conclusion, the Tribunal will not intervene simply because another view could have been taken.

That is particularly relevant for authorities navigating complex, high value interventions. The judgment recognises that decisions often turn on contested assumptions, imperfect data and difficult trade offs. Disagreement over the weight given to alternatives, counterfactuals or financial modelling will not, without more, cross the high threshold of irrationality. The law does not demand analytical perfection, it requires structured reasoning and defensible judgment.

For public authorities, the practical lessons are clear:

  • Be explicit about the policy objectives a subsidy is intended to achieve
  • Show that real alternatives have been considered and explained away
  • Maintain a clear audit trail of advice, evidence and reasoning
  • Sense check conclusions against the public law standard of rationality, rather than trying to eliminate every possible criticism

Taken together, the case offers welcome reassurance. Where public authorities take subsidy decisions carefully, transparently and for proper policy reasons, the UK subsidy control regime allows space for judgment  even in economically sensitive and politically exposed projects.

Get in touch

The content of this page is a summary of the law in force at the date of publication and is not exhaustive, nor does it contain definitive advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought in relation to any queries that may arise.

Related news & articles

Subscribe to our mailing list
1 of 1
  • Article

    The Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025: English law, cryptoassets and digital asset disputes

  • Article

    FCA non-financial misconduct (NFM): what changes on 1 September 2026 and what financial services firms must do now

  • Article

    Business immigration routes for financial services businesses expanding to the UK

  • Article

    FCA publishes final rules for Motor Finance Redress Scheme – what’s changed, what stays the same, and what firms should do now?

  • Article

    Authorise or Exit: The FCA’s Crypto Regime is almost here – are you ready?

  • Article

    The FinTech IPO Playbook: Decoding the UK’s equity markets for companies seeking scale

  • Article

    HM Treasury unveils landmark overhaul of the Appointed Representatives Regime

  • Article

    Crypto promotions under fire: FCA takes High Court action against HTX as UK clampdown intensifies

  • Article

    FCA Motor Finance Redress Consultation: What’s Next?

  • News

    Freeths Liverpool accelerates growth with strategic appointments

  • Article

    The FCA’s Redress Scheme: What lenders and dealers need to know now

  • Article

    Navigating the FCA’s Latest Crypto Consultation: Key Regulatory Insights for Firms

Get in touch

Contact us today

Whatever your legal needs, our wide ranging expertise is here to support you and your business, so let’s start your legal journey today and get you in touch with the right lawyer to get you started.

Telephone

Get in touch

For general enquiries, please complete this form and we will direct your message to the most appropriate person.