Draft Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
On 30 July 2026, Acas published a consultation on a revised draft Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
The current Code is primarily concerned with ensuring fairness once a disciplinary or grievance process has begun. The new draft Code shifts the focus significantly towards:
Preventing escalation
Resolving issues informally where possible
Encouraging early intervention
Providing better training and support
Improving workplace relationships and
Reducing the costs associated with formal disputes
ACAS has justified the changes by reference to research showing that formal conflict resolution costs employers approximately £2.36 billion annually and that 44% of working-age adults experienced workplace conflict during the previous year.
The practical effect is that tribunals may increasingly scrutinise not only how employers conducted formal procedures, but what they did before the formal process commenced.
Get in touch
Early and informal resolution
Informal resolution has been included in the Code of Practice for the first time. The draft explicitly encourages employees and workers to try to resolve concerns informally and at an early stage, in order to prevent unnecessary escalation and avoid unreasonable delays. It also makes clear that informal handling should not itself result in formal disciplinary action.
A failure to attempt informal resolution can directly impact an employment tribunal's decision to increase or decrease compensation awards by up to 25%. Where a concern is not fully resolved informally, it may be helpful to meet again to discuss the issue before escalating to a formal process.
A notable drafting change is that employers are expected to explain:
What informal steps were taken before commencing a formal process or
Why informal resolution was not appropriate
This information should appear in correspondence commencing formal proceedings.
New sections
For the first time the draft Code contains a standalone section dealing with discrimination and reasonable adjustments. The draft introduces guidance reminding users to avoid unlawful discrimination and to consider reasonable adjustment that may be needed to make process fair.
Workers are encouraged to communicate any adjustments they may need as early as possible, to allow sufficient time for those adjustments to be put in place: for example, ensuring that a meeting room is physically accessible.
The draft describes training and support for managers, workers and representatives as good practice, aimed at building confidence and skills in resolving workplace concerns. Good practice recommendations include training line managers and representatives to spot and handle issues early, before they escalate.
Employers are specifically encouraged to ensure:
Managers can identify emerging workplace conflict
Managers understand informal resolution techniques
Representatives receive appropriate training
Workers understand available processes and
Mediation options are understood
The Code increasingly treats workplace conflict as a management capability issue rather than simply an HR process issue.
Tribunals may become more willing to ask:
Were managers trained?
Were they competent to conduct the process?
Were they aware of alternatives?
Suspension
The draft introduces a strict “necessity test” for workplace suspension, providing significantly more detail than the current Code. Suspension should be used only in limited circumstances and must not be treated as a routine or neutral act.
Employers must explicitly justify why suspension is required rather than applying it automatically. Periods of suspension must be as short as possible, actively monitored, regularly reviewed, and clearly communicated to the employee as a non-disciplinary measure.
Employers should implement:
Suspension risk assessments
Formal review periods
Alternative duties assessments
Homeworking options consideration and
Written suspension rationale forms
Formal disciplinary meetings
When inviting a worker to a formal disciplinary meeting, employers would be expected to explain what informal steps have already been taken, or why none were taken. They must give the worker adequate time (typically 3 to 5 working day minimum) to review evidence and organise a defence. The worker has a statutory right to bring a trade union representative or workplace colleague. If the worker is unable or unwilling to attend the disciplinary meeting with good reasoning, the employer should make a decision based on the available evidence.
New written statement requirements
New written statement requirements
The draft Code also encourages a short, clear initial written explanation rather than unnecessarily long or complex grievances, while allowing further information to be provided later if needed.
For justifying suspensions, the written records must show that suspension was only used when strictly necessary and after reviewing alternatives. Written policies must account for and document any necessary adjustments for disabled workers throughout the process.
Employers should expect to formally document and record:
Informal discussions
Reasons for escalation
Adjustment considerations
Suspension decisions
Mediation considerations
Investigation steps and
Review decisions
The draft reflects a wider expectation that employers should be able to demonstrate why decisions were reached rather than merely proving procedural fairness.
A new section on Mediation and facilitated conversations
A new section encourages consideration of mediation and facilitated conversations where appropriate and possible. ACAS encourages employers to consider:
Mediation
Facilitated discussions
Relationship repair exercises
Workplace restoration processes and
Independent intervention
Importantly, where mediation is agreed, formal processes may be paused. Any third-party involvement should be with an accredited mediator or trained facilitator who is impartial and does not take sides. Where mediation or a facilitated conversation is agreed during a formal disciplinary process, the formal procedure should be paused. This approach can be particularly helpful where misconduct or poor performance is linked to a working relationship issue.
Historically, mediation has often been viewed as optional. The draft elevates it into a recognised conflict-resolution tool which employers may increasingly be expected to consider and to explain why they did not use it if they chose not to.
Terminology
The draft generally uses “worker” rather than “employee”, except where the specific legal status of employee is intended. ACAS wants the principles of fair dispute resolution to apply to a much broader section of the workforce, such as casual staff, contractors, and zero-hours workers.
What has not changed
Despite the extensive revisions, the following core principles remain substantially unchanged:
Prompt action
Reasonable investigation
Notice of allegations
Disclosure of evidence
An opportunity to respond
Impartial decision-making
The right to be accompanied
The right of appeal and
Procedural fairness generally
Summary
The draft Code is not really about disciplinary and grievance hearings. It is about conflict management and that represents a fundamental shift in approach.
The biggest risks for employers under the proposed Code will be:
Failing to attempt and document informal resolution
Automatically suspending employees
Failing to consider reasonable adjustments
Poorly trained managers handling conflict
Failing to consider mediation
Inadequate documentation explaining why decisions were made
Treating formal procedures as the first rather than the last step
The revised Code is only in draft form and is not yet in force. It may be amended before it takes effect, but the expectation is that the majority of the revisions will remain. Employers should therefore begin considering updates to their policies, practices and management training programmes now.
How we can help
If you have any queries regarding the draft Code of Practice, please get in touch with authors Rena Magdani, Matt McBride or another member of our Employment team.
Read the other articles featured in our latest Employment update here:
The content of this page is a summary of the law in force at the date of publication and is not exhaustive, nor does it contain definitive advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought in relation to any queries that may arise.
Related news & articles
Related expertise
Contact us today
Whatever your legal needs, our wide ranging expertise is here to support you and your business, so let’s start your legal journey today and get you in touch with the right lawyer to get you started.
Get in touch
For general enquiries, please complete this form and we will direct your message to the most appropriate person.